A Rare Crappy Conversation
Well, although it's late at night and I've got my maths paper coming up in 3 (ok, make that 2, considering it's after midnight now) days time, I thought I'd just blog and get more of a life (well, I wouldn't say "get a life", since there isn't one in engineering in general and it's not like blogging is an activity full of 'life' as one would see it) considering that I've been studying for at least 5-7 hours a day, everyday including weekends and I'm getting sick of it.
Anyway, just a couple of days ago, my sis and I actually had a rare conversation. Well, not that conversations were rare between us, but it is rare (as the title suggests) as my anti-crappy sis actually started crapping. And since it's actually so rare, I thought I'd just blog about it. And here was how it went:
[As Glass Cookie (GC)'s sister was lying on her bed, GC noticed something about her head/scalp/whatever-you-call-it]
GC: Hey, I could see a bald patch (ie. on GC's sis' head)
GC's sis: Huh? Where?
GC: Hmmm, pass me your camera phone...
[GC takes hold of GC's sis' phone and tries to snap a picture]
GC (can't really be bothered to check out the settings for himself): Hey, it's pitch dark.
GC's sis: Oh, you need to switch to night mode.
GC's thoughts: Yup, I know that. Hmmm... I should have just changed it myself. What was I thinking about asking her?
[GC snaps the picture and passes his sis the camera phone, and some conversation with regards to the bald patch takes place. Then, it reaches a point where: ]
...
...
...
GC: Hey, I think I know how you got it (ie. the bald patch). Do you still remember? When we were kids, we were running at home and you hit your head against a chair.
GC's sis: Huh? Is it? I can't remember leh...
GC: Well, it's a white chair at our house in Farrer Court, remember?
GC's sis: You see la. If I didn't hit my head I would be in RJ already...
GC (taken aback at the crappy answer): Hey, you're crapping! ... ... Well, I also remember hitting my head against the tap twice when I was small. Daddy even panicked at the sight of the blood...
GC's sis: Oh, then you could have gone to Harvard already (if not for the accidents)...
And surprisingly, the above was not all. Somehow, the crappy conversation went on to what criteria would she use should any guy be interested in her. And this was the list that she gave (note that the bracketed figure states the percentage of guys left after the condition has been in place):
GC's sis' Criteria
- He must not have any leg hair (50%)
- He must not have disgusting skin complexion (50%)
-He must be taller than her (65%)
- Totally disgusting guys are out (ie. having one or more of the following): (80%)
>>> minimal hygiene
>>> play neopets
>>> beer belly
>>> greasy, unkempt hair
>>> guys who finish up their meal and burping loudly, then saying "bao2 bao3"
>>> has a habit of biting his nails
- His salary must be higher than her (80%)
- He must be stronger than her - or she will club him to death (60%)
- He must not be a wimp (85%)
- He mustn't like pink (99%)
- Lame guys are out, because she thinks their jokes are retarded (But do note that this does not apply to my kind of crapping as my sis thinks that at least the kind of crap I post on my blog shows "some kind of intelligence" to her). (95%)
But the thing is, I thought the following criteria would be applicable:
- He must be able to accept physical abuse (50%)
- He must be able to withstand verbal abuse (e.g. from GC's sis: "I hate your Hong Kong accent") (50%)
- He must be able to withstand belittlement (e.g. from GC's sis: "I despise you"), considering that guys do have an ego (25%)
- He must not be introverted (50%)
- He must accept her "cute" size (25%)
And on top of that, general statistics, trends and assumptions have it that:
- Guys make up 50% of the population (50%)
- 50% of the guys are supposedly attached (50%)
- He must be a Christian (14%)
- His education must equal her or better (75%)
Considering that she would be exposed to 3 batches of people around her age group, and that she was born in the dragon year, the number of people for the sample size would be 50,000 (estimated figure for dragon year babies of her birth year) +40,000 x 2 = 130,000.
Thus, multiplying the above figure with all the percentages would leave her with 1.33 guy(s) (well, I'm not sure if 1.33 is indicative of a plural or not, so I thought I'd just play safe and leave it as a bracket 's'). And since it's not possible to be attached to 0.33 of a guy (I shall not elaborate on how a guy could be 0.33 lest it gets way off topic), that leaves her with one guy.
And my sis' conclusion was, that has to be the guy that God has in store for her. =)
Hmmm, I have no idea how to end this post, so I shall simply end now.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home